Student Solitary Confinement – email template for staff/ parents

Hello

Is [NAME OF SCHOOL/ COLLEGE/ UNIVERSITY] seriously imposing solitary confinement on innocent students for fifteen days? And disciplining students who do not comply or handing them over to the authorities? Solitary confinement is a form of torture and we can expect rising rates of depression, mental illness, self-harm and suicide to follow. That’s not a good look for a [school/ college/ university] proud to be [a Stonewall Diversity champion and] Positive about Disabled People. No matter how economically convenient (until outraged parents take legal action for harms caused) torture is not a solution!

According to Juan Mendez, the former United Nations special rapporteur on torture, the imposition of solitary confinement “of any duration, on persons with mental disabilities is cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.” He has called on governments to abolish it for prisoners with psychosocial or cognitive disabilities.

He has also said that “the longer the duration of solitary confinement or the greater the uncertainty regarding the length of time, the greater the risk of serious and irreparable harm to the inmate that may constitute cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment or even torture.”

https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/10/29/submission-un-committee-against-torture-france

Under Scots Law, staff who enforce these measures may also be legally liable – judged to be acting “on a frolic of their own” as the antiquated legal phrase puts it – as “only following orders” went out as an excuse in 1948 at the Nuremberg Trials. So the [school/ college/ university] is also setting up staff for legal liability. That’s hardly Dignity At Work!

  • There is no provision in law for the imposition of solitary confinement (of any duration) on students nor for threatening staff with disciplinary action if they do not enforce it.
  • There is no provision in law for the mandatory download and use of any technology by individual members of the public.
  • Self-isolation must be, and must be seen to be, voluntary.

None of us is above the law. I make no judgement on the good intentions of those who are currently mandating the illegal imposition of solitary confinement. No doubt they passed lockdown in a spacious house with a lovely garden. Not in a dorm room smaller than a jail cell.

Permit me to say that the feelings of these people are not my chief concern at the moment. My priority is the physical and mental wellbeing of our [students/ children] and of my fellow [staff/ parents] – as well as the legal liability which the [school/ college/ university] as a corporate body and individual staff members are now open to because of this solitary confinement regime.

A better tack to take (and one more likely to avoid students ripping up residences to form barricades while singing La Marseillaise) might be to invite the students to self-isolate, to support them (and staff) – and to supply them with limes! 

Yours sincerely,

…………………………………………. [ YOUR NAME]

White hands of a youth clutch black prison bars

Thanks to George Hodan for releasing his image Children’s Hands into the Public Domain.

Advertisement

Letter template to MP re. Drug Company Indemnity etc.

Dear [NAME OF MP],

Drug and data companies are clever. They spend an unusually large proportion of their budget pushing their products, and profits, using sophisticated strategies such as participative marketing (typically where hot young men and women, often paid actors, appear to voluntarily enthuse about their wares).

These companies have no other values than the bottom line yet are aware that values push products and drug companies specialise in appeals to altruism and emotional blackmail. Because they sell drugs.

Right now, while we hear of poor White students paid to volunteer to be experimented on, and don’t hear about the thousands of Black and Brown people abroad who suffered multiple harms from such experimental vaccines, drug barons have successfully lobbied the U.K. Government to rig a leading and misleading “consultation” regarding their legal indemnity to prosecution when such harms become widespread here, caused by the “Covid-19” injection – which mutates human DNA using nanotechnology controlled by data companies with a publicly stated agenda of global depopulation (as even this US government-funded ‘charity’ fails to hide).

Meanwhile, even supposedly clued-up institutions such as [CHECK YOUR LOCAL UNIVERSITY/ COLLEGE/ LIBRARY WEBSITE TO SEE IF THEY MENTION EXEMPTIONS TO MASK-WEARING] contravene provisions of the Equality Act 2010, Data Protection Act 2018 and Coronavirus Act 2020, by mandating mask-wearing without mention of legal exemption, thus setting up a hostile environment for people with health conditions and failing to provide access to the disabled.

  • Oppose these changes to advertising and indemnity
  • Oppose appropriation of the human person by the state (including opt-out replacing opt-in for organ donation)
  • Oppose curfews, lockdowns, shutdowns and any measures, such as obligatory or mandatory vaccination/ “immunity” passports/ mask-wearing/ sensitive data-sharing, which exacerbate the physical and psychological harms already prevalent in your constituency (suicides, unemployment, depression, death due to cancelled appointments, death due to fear of seeing a doctor, death due to fear stoked by relentless media fear-mongering, agoraphobia, economic ruin, career sabotage, mental illness, domestic violence, xenophobia)
  • Oppose censorship of medical experts who question the official version of the Covid-19 narrative in terms of symptomology or epidemiology

Someone as intelligent and informed as you cannot be ignorant of the agenda of The Great Reset/ 4th Industrial Revolution – set up by stakeholder capitalists (such as the World Economic Forum, World Bank, Microsoft, Gates Foundation, etc.) in a publicly-available videoed series of biological threat preparedness tabletop roleplays since 2001 (Dark Winter/ Atlantic Storm/ Crimson Contagion/ Event 201, etc.) – so there is no excuse to be taken off guard by what is coming.

Our citizen rights are being stripped. Our communities are being destroyed. Our most vulnerable are either suffering or dead.

What are you doing?

Apart from standing by, clapping, while drug and data companies increase their profits and continue to insist on you covering your mouth with a mask – and your eyes with wool.

Regards, [YOUR FULL NAME]

[YOUR ADDRESS AND POSTCODE]

Thanks to George Hodan for releasing his image Plastic Syringe into the Public Domain.

UK GOV Consultation on Covid “Vaccine” etc. suggested response

Open consultation

Consultation document: changes to Human Medicine Regulations to support the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines

Published 28 August 2020

SUGGESTED RESPONSE (ANYTHING NOT IN BOLD)

About You

(name and surname)

No

No

(individual/ organisation)

(ethnicity and area of UK)

5 areas you can comment on (tick all):

Temporary authorisation of the supply of unlicensed products

No. Authorisation of the supply of unlicensed products, temporary or not, is an extremely dangerous and disproportionate response to the current situation.

Civil liability and immunity

No. Immunity from civil liability means that there is no incentive for pharmaceutical companies (who have a history of causing human harms, especially in developing countries) to ensure that their product is safe and therefore they can act with impunity with profit as their sole concern.

Expansion to the workforce eligible to administer vaccinations

No. Administration of vaccines by unqualified persons is, clearly, unsafe and risks more harm than good.

Vaccine promotion

No. Vaccine promotion violates UK advertising standards and is unsafe.

Provisions for wholesale dealing of vaccines

No. Unlicensed wholesalers should not be dealing with vaccines in any capacity whatsoever. This is clearly unsafe and open to abuse.

Feedback

How satisfied are you with the consultation process?

Disappointed

How did you hear about the consultation?

(Various options, mine is Social Media)

On which social media channel did you hear about the consultation?

(Department of Health & Social Care/ Another government department/ [mine is Other – individual Twitter])

What could we do better?

  1. “a tested, unlicensed vaccine against COVID-19” suggests that this pharmaceutical product has gone through usual testing. This is untrue and is the reason why it is unlicensed. This wording is misleading and risks human harms.
  2. “the proposed changes will also facilitate the efficient mass distribution of treatments for COVID-19”. Pushing an untested unlicensed drug, administered by unqualified persons, using currently illegal advertising can hardly be described as “efficient mass distribution of treatments”. This wording is misleading and risks human harms.
  3. “Clarify the scope of immunity from civil liability”. The aim is not to clarify but to *change* the scope. This wording is misleading and risks human harms.
  4. “the deployment of a safe and effective vaccine or therapeutic product, will of course have a beneficial impact”. It would but for the reasons given here this is, clearly, not what is being promoted. This wording is misleading and risks human harms.
  5. “having to move quickly means having less time than we would like to consult on these proposals – indeed, we are asking for comments by the end of Friday 18 September 2020.” This is an unprecedented rush, clearly designed to truncate the consultation period so that responses from primed stakeholders will outweigh those of the general public. This is undemocratic.
  6. “Even though we are happy to receive comments from anyone, the purpose of this consultation exercise is to engage directly with specific stakeholders that we have identified.” How patronising!!!!! So this is set up as a sham PR event, when the UK people appear to be consulted (in a rush, with misleading wording) but actually it is only primed responses that the UK Government is interested in.
  7. All in all this survey is unethical and lacks academic integrity. The wording is leading and misleading and there is not distance from the data. For all of these reasons, it should never have made it through whichever Ethics Committee approved its use.

Thanks to George Hodan for releasing his image Plastic Syringe into the Public Domain.